This bond is especially necessary in those sections of the film in which the Hogwarts gang goes through the agonies of teenage romantic attachment. They’ve become as familiar as family members, and “Half-Blood Prince” trades on that connection to keep us involved when things get slow. That investment of time also means we’ve been watching the film’s trio of youthful principals - Daniel Radcliffe as Harry, Rupert Grint as sidekick Ron Weasley and Emma Watson as brainy Hermione Granger - grow up on screen since 2001. To mark the 20th anniversary of the first book’s release, Rowling took to her Twitter account to write, “20 years ago today a world that I had lived in alone was suddenly open to others. We don’t turn to these films for thrilling or original cinema, we look for a level of craft, consistency and, most of all, fidelity to the originals - all of which we get. Now in its sixth episode shot over an eight-year span, with two more features still to come, this one-of-a-kind film cycle has become as comfortable and reliable as an old shoe, providing a degree of dependability that’s becoming increasingly rare.Īs directed by David Yates, who did the previous film and is on tap for the final two, “Half-Blood Prince” demonstrates the ways that the Potter pictures have become the modern exemplars of establishment moviemaking. “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince” is being described as an excursion into the dark side for this venerable series, but don’t let the chatter fool you. The following review of “Harry Potter and the Half≫lood Prince” was first published July 14, 2009. From our archives, we’re resurfacing The Times’ original reviews of each Harry Potter film adaptation. Today marks the 20th anniversary of the first book in J.K.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |